Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Do the number of bottling lines determine the number of HACCP plans

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Radhika13

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted Today, 05:13 AM

We have 4 wine bottling line Line-1 is advance and have cork and wirehood installation machine,labelling, line -2 is simple with rinser,filling,screw capper,labelling, line-3 again with rinser,filler,capper and labelling , and line-4 is canning line .there is difference in number of rinsers, no of nozzles for filler and types of filler ..so according to this do I need to make 4 HACCP Plan or manual for each line ? 



Dorothy87

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 264 posts
  • 74 thanks
88
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:York
  • Interests:Antiques, Art, Sailing

Posted Today, 08:02 AM

;) 

 

Hi, 

 

I don't think so, as long as process is the same (you can add extra steps) you should have 1 HACCP plan. 

 

;) 



Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,717 posts
  • 382 thanks
460
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted Today, 11:20 AM

If the lines are fundamentally the same, you should not need a HACCP plan for each line. I agree with Dorothy87.


-Setanta         

 

 

 


Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,713 posts
  • 1560 thanks
1,703
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted Today, 12:25 PM

Your flow chart is where you can describe the slight difference in steps between the lines, and in steps 5/6/7/8 you label those steps with the line number they impact


  • BM5 likes this

Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 706 posts
  • 136 thanks
225
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 02:09 PM

We use one plan for several different styles of packaging, and different types of packaging machines.  As a general rule I keep descriptions simple and use generalized language for most flow chart and risk analysis documents -- to make it easier to apply to multiple different mechanical systems that all do the same type of process.  

 

In a flow chart some steps can be optional, or not apply to all products.  As long as you can describe to an auditor which steps apply to which products, I wouldn't expect there to be a problem.  





Share this

3 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users