Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Does BRCGS Clause 3.11.4 Apply to Incidents Involving Products Excluded from Audit Scope?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 310 posts
  • 111 thanks
52
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2024 - 02:10 PM

Is this clause triggered if it is related to product specifically excluded from the BRCGS audit scope?

 

3.11.4 - In the event of a significant food safety, authenticity or legality incident, including a product recall, regulatory food safety non-conformity (e.g. a regulatory enforcement notice) or food safety-related withdrawal, the certification body issuing the current certificate for the site against this Standard shall be notified within 3 working days. The company shall then provide sufficient information to enable the certification body to assess any effects of the incident on the ongoing validity of the current certificate within 21 calendar days. As a minimum, this shall include corrective action, root cause analysis and a preventive action plan.

Attached Files


Edited by Marshenko, 26 July 2024 - 02:11 PM.


Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,660 posts
  • 1550 thanks
1,679
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 26 July 2024 - 03:16 PM

Yes, as the facility is certified not the product


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 310 posts
  • 111 thanks
52
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2024 - 05:16 PM

Yes, as the facility is certified not the product

That's what I say too...



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,833 posts
  • 1161 thanks
1,192
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 26 July 2024 - 05:37 PM

Yes, in agreement with others.

 

Here's a fun twist on this. You all remember when a large mid-west egg producer some years back got into a big problem with excessive chicken waste and ended up with a massive recall.

 

Now. they had something like 15 locations with some bring SQF certified - not this one however.

 

Well. news media catches wind that the company is SQF certified and contacts SQFI directly. of course SQF has no idea about the situation because as I mentioned this location was not SQF certified - thus NO notification... but it did create a very big debacle.

 

In that case it was suggested that even if a location is not SQF but others in the same company are that a notification be made anyway, explaining the situation and make not that this particular facility is not SQF certified.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC

Consulting on: SQF Food Safety System Development, Implementation & Certification

eConsultant Retainer | Internal Auditor Training | Corrective Action Avoidance | XRP & XLM

 

Vineyard Haven, Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachussetts

Republic of these United States (restored)
 

www.GlennOster.com | 774.563.6161 | glenn@glennoster.com
 

 

 

 


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,336 posts
  • 1316 thanks
657
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 29 July 2024 - 04:57 AM

Hi Marshenko,

 

I think you already know the answer, BRCGS Global Standard Food Safety Issue 9 section 3.11.4 Guidance refers to ‘all’ and ‘any’ several times, making it quite clear:

 

Guidance on Notification of recalls to the certification body

Where there is a significant incident related to product safety, authenticity or legality the site manufacturing or processing the implicated product is required to notify their certification body of the situation. The types of situation that should be notified include:

all product recalls

any situation where the regulatory authority insists on action (e.g. an enforcement notice) due to product safety or legality concerns

• legal proceedings with respect to product safety or legality

• adverse media attention relating to product safety

any food safety incident with the potential to harm a consumer

any food safety-related product withdrawal (it is worth noting that only product safety- related withdrawals need to be notified to the certification body; other types of product withdrawal, such as those related to product quality, do not need to be notified).

The aim of this notification is to ensure that the integrity of the certificate is maintained by allowing the certification body to assess whether the incident affects the certification status of the site.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony



Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 310 posts
  • 111 thanks
52
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 July 2024 - 10:21 PM

CB notified.

 

 

Yes, as the facility is certified not the product

Second question, and tagged Scampi specifically even though they are located in Canada.

 

United States.

Frozen raw seafood product sold to customer in Q1 2024.

Customer pulls a single sample to test after having been in customer's possession for 3 months, sample tests positive for salmonella spp.

Is product considered adulterated?

Customer is removing product from their "stores"

Would we be responsible for doing the same based off of their single, non-composite sample?

 

All fish
Salmonella spp.:
Presence of organism
Sec. 555.300 Compliance Policy Guide


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,336 posts
  • 1316 thanks
657
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 30 July 2024 - 04:48 AM

Most people would investigate and test a number of samples before withdrawing a product.


  • G M likes this

Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 310 posts
  • 111 thanks
52
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 July 2024 - 04:18 PM

Most people would investigate and test a number of samples before withdrawing a product.

Which makes sense  :spoton:

 

I've sent four samples already, +CoA from supplier.





Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users