I feel we are taking undue risks with the product, but senior management doesn't seem to see it like that. Can someone provide advice on what to do?
Thank you!
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:27 PM
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:33 PM
The right thing to do would be to invest in some kind of blast chiller that can chill the product faster. Or store the sauce in a different shape container, a shape that would also promote faster cooling (e.g. thinner so the distance between the center and outer edge is reduced). Simply put one set of lab results from one batch is not enough to prove that your system is safe. You'd have to do some kind of extensive validation study. An auditor would likely question the system you have in place, citing the FDA cooling guidelines. Also on the subject of your thawing from the freezer, could you not bring the frozen sauce out perhaps 7 days in advance to fully thaw it in the fridge instead of doing that final thaw at room temp?
You say they've been doing this forever, but is this the first time your facility is being audited by a third-party? I assume you've been inspected by the FDA before, has this never come up?
Edited by Brothbro, 06 September 2023 - 09:34 PM.
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:46 PM
...
Senior management says they won't change the process as they've been doing it this way for over 30 years without any issues....
Have they been doing micro testing on the finished product for that amount of time as well? While I find some of the time frames material is in the "danger zone" temperature range sketchy, if you can produce enough historical data to support your process as validated to be safe, there is little for anyone to argue with.
If this testing data doesn't exist yet, start doing so. Collecting it is likely the only alternative to complying with standard processes that are validated by third parties.
Right now that quoted statement above could just as well read "Haven't been caught yet" without the validation.
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:50 PM
thank you
The right thing to do would be to invest in some kind of blast chiller that can chill the product faster. Or store the sauce in a different shape container, a shape that would also promote faster cooling (e.g. thinner so the distance between the center and outer edge is reduced). Simply put one set of lab results from one batch is not enough to prove that your system is safe. You'd have to do some kind of extensive validation study. An auditor would likely question the system you have in place, citing the FDA cooling guidelines. Also on the subject of your thawing from the freezer, could you not bring the frozen sauce out perhaps 7 days in advance to fully thaw it in the fridge instead of doing that final thaw at room temp?
You say they've been doing this forever, but is this the first time your facility is being audited by a third-party? I assume you've been inspected by the FDA before, has this never come up?
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:56 PM
I don't know what to do to convince them that this isn't right, even if they haven't had any problems. But it's not about waiting for something bad to happen.
Sure, it's a hard situation when you're lower on the totem pole and up against senior staff. If possible I would begin collecting routine micro data on your sauces to begin building a case, like GM mentions. The cost associated with this may be less than a chiller, but still works towards a process improvement. Hard to believe that even senior QA doesn't see a problem with this, they should at least see the benefit in validating your current process.
Posted 06 September 2023 - 09:57 PM
Have they been doing micro testing on the finished product for that amount of time as well? While I find some of the time frames material is in the "danger zone" temperature range sketchy, if you can produce enough historical data to support your process as validated to be safe, there is little for anyone to argue with.
If this testing data doesn't exist yet, start doing so. Collecting it is likely the only alternative to complying with standard processes that are validated by third parties.
Right now that quoted statement above could just as well read "Haven't been caught yet" without the validation.
Posted 06 September 2023 - 10:04 PM
Sure, it's a hard situation when you're lower on the totem pole and up against senior staff. If possible I would begin collecting routine micro data on your sauces to begin building a case, like GM mentions. The cost associated with this may be less than a chiller, but still works towards a process improvement. Hard to believe that even senior QA doesn't see a problem with this, they should at least see the benefit in validating your current process.
Thank you, I will continue to collect the data. I was worried if it would be deemed acceptable because an auditor might not consider my circumstances or whether I have control over their decisions.
Posted 06 September 2023 - 10:57 PM
The frozen ingredients left to thaw at room temp could allow the growing of pathogens that produce toxins that would not be destroyed during pasteurization.
it sounds like this process isn't being controlled. this is problematic. especially since it appears it is not being monitored.
while you still do have risks after pasteurization, id also be concerned about spoilage as well. that might be another angle of approach.
IMO simple testing is meaningless. it's like finding a needle in a haystack.
odwalla made unpasteurized juice for decades before they sickened and killed kids. History is not an argument for circumventing food safety.
maybe you could search for 483 or warning letters with similar circumstances.
Twofishfs@gmail.com
Posted 06 September 2023 - 11:07 PM
The frozen ingredients left to thaw at room temp could allow the growing of pathogens that produce toxins that would not be destroyed during pasteurization.
it sounds like this process isn't being controlled. this is problematic. especially since it appears it is not being monitored.
while you still do have risks after pasteurization, id also be concerned about spoilage as well. that might be another angle of approach.
IMO simple testing is meaningless. it's like finding a needle in a haystack.
odwalla made unpasteurized juice for decades before they sickened and killed kids. History is not an argument for circumventing food safety.
maybe you could search for 483 or warning letters with similar circumstances.
Thank you. Trust me, I'm not comfortable with our current mode of operation. I'm eager to shift people's mindset, but I need to begin with something tangible. My primary concern is ensuring people don't fall ill or face potentially fatal consequences, even if they claim everything is fine just because they have over 30 years of experience backing them up.
Posted 07 September 2023 - 04:43 AM
Thank you. Trust me, I'm not comfortable with our current mode of operation. I'm eager to shift people's mindset, but I need to begin with something tangible. My primary concern is ensuring people don't fall ill or face potentially fatal consequences, even if they claim everything is fine just because they have over 30 years of experience backing them up.
Hi lauMoH,
I appreciate this sort of thing can be quite frustrating.
This can be fixed using a relatively cheap and simple solution. If your refrigeration is reasonable then rapid cooling can be achieved by placing product pallets in industrial size boxes with a large fan that blasts cool air in the refrigerator through the pallet.
I’m attaching some images to make it easier for you to see what I mean:
Industrial Cooling Box.png 1016.5KB
4 downloads
Industrial Cooling Fan.png 1.19MB
4 downloads
Kind regards,
Tony
Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 07 September 2023 - 07:20 AM
Hi lauMoH,
From a purely Organisational POV I think I would be somewhat concerned if the responsibility for the final approval of the finished products being commercialised was nominally yourself. I hope your self-protection is not at risk.
From an auditorial POV I fear that some of the previous suggestions may well be an exercise in futility albeit it with the noblest of intentions. Auditors are typically, professionally obliged to follow their Regulatory instructions/Procedures and especially where specific, quantitative, safety-related requirements exist. Sampling evidence showing no detected problems can never statistically prove/guarantee that such problems do not exist in the source material. The only IMO potentially useful result of such a study might be if an auditee's proposal of an alternative validation offer is included (detailed?) in FDA's associated Regulatory documentation but I doubt that this exists in the present (repeatedly historically documented) case ?.
You can find several analogous Company situations to the current case discussed in threads on this Forum with requests for possible Personal actions. One often popular suggestion is RUN.
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 07 September 2023 - 07:22 PM
Hi lauMoH,
I appreciate this sort of thing can be quite frustrating.
This can be fixed using a relatively cheap and simple solution. If your refrigeration is reasonable then rapid cooling can be achieved by placing product pallets in industrial size boxes with a large fan that blasts cool air in the refrigerator through the pallet.
I’m attaching some images to make it easier for you to see what I mean:
Kind regards,
Tony
Thank you, Tony! I will suggest this solution maybe we can achieve the time/temperature with this option.
Posted 07 September 2023 - 07:31 PM
Hi lauMoH,
From a purely Organisational POV I think I would be somewhat concerned if the responsibility for the final approval of the finished products being commercialised was nominally yourself. I hope your self-protection is not at risk.
From an auditorial POV I fear that some of the previous suggestions may well be an exercise in futility albeit it with the noblest of intentions. Auditors are typically, professionally obliged to follow their Regulatory instructions/Procedures and especially where specific, quantitative, safety-related requirements exist. Sampling evidence showing no detected problems can never statistically prove/guarantee that such problems do not exist in the source material. The only IMO potentially useful result of such a study might be if an auditee's proposal of an alternative validation offer is included (detailed?) in FDA's associated Regulatory documentation but I doubt that this exists in the present (repeatedly historically documented) case ?.
You can find several analogous Company situations to the current case discussed in threads on this Forum with requests for possible Personal actions. One often popular suggestion is RUN.
Thank you, Charles. I have indeed taken into account that suggested idea. However, the issue lies in the fact that senior management will continue to follow their current approach, which could potentially impact individuals negatively. It's necessary to take action to address this situation.
Welcome to the IFSQN →
Welcome! Introduce Yourself →
Hello world!Started by edusanros, 12 Aug 2024 ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Food Safety Topics →
Food Technology →
Is Our Non-Dairy Sweet Sauce Process Adequately Safe for Scaling Up Without Hot Filling?Started by Levolas, 06 Aug 2024 ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Global Food Safety Standards →
PrimusGFS →
Module 9 IPM best practicesStarted by Seathalos, 16 Jul 2024 ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Food Safety Topics →
Food Safety Talk →
New Consultation Opens for GFSI Benchmarking Requirements v2024Started by Tony-C, 16 Jul 2024 ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Government Regulatory →
FDA - U.S. Food and Drug Administration →
The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) →
Help Understanding HARPC's Appendix 3 Tables on Bacterial Pathogen Growth and InactivationStarted by zechzplz, 09 Jul 2024 ![]() |
|
![]() |
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users