What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Canadian Ingredient Declaration for Various flours

Started by , Apr 06 2022 04:58 PM
1 Reply

Hello all,

 

I need your guidance or direction please.

 

Our bakery has aquired a new company that has been added to our facility.

 

This product is a cracker like product.

 

It contains the following flours:

 

1) Strong bakers flour

2)Enriched durum semolina

3) Stone ground whole wheat flour

 

According to Canadian regulations,  Can I list #s 1 and 3 as "Wheat flour" and just list separately the "Enriched durum semolina" in order of decending weight?

 

Any guidance or direction would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Thank you in advance.

 

 

KBMB

 

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Bill S-211 - Forced and Child Labour in Canadian Supply Chains (audit?) Canadian and US maximum permissible level of heavy metals in fish Canadian label ingredients Supplying Water to Employees in Canadian Manufacturing Facilities Canadian Metal Detectable Limits
[Ad]

So the flour should be labeled as such ---i could not find any references to duram wheat---I believe you'll have to lump them together as flour as per below

https://inspection.c...341?chap=2#s7c2

For example:

Ingredients: Wheat flour • Water • Vegetable oil margarine • Sugar • Yeast • Canola oil shortening • Potato starch • Garlic • Salt • Parsley • Seasoning • Diacetyl acid esters of mono and diglycerides • Whey powder • Calcium propionate • Potassium bisulphite
Contains: Wheat • Milk • Sesame • Sulphites

 

https://inspection.c...60867?chap=0#c3

In this example, all food allergens, gluten sources and added sulpthites are declared at least once in the contains statement, even though wheat and potassium bisulphite (sulphites) already appear in the ingredient list. Since a contains statement is being used to declare other known allergen sources (milk and sesame), wheat and sulphites must appear in both places

 

 

Stone ground claims

The claim "stone ground" on products is acceptable for products that have been ground between two stones. This claim would not apply to products ground between metal and stone or metal and metal or product that is partially stone ground and partially steel ground. If steel grinding is also used "partially stone ground" would be acceptable.

 

 

Hope some of the above is helpful

1 Like1 Thank

Similar Discussion Topics
Bill S-211 - Forced and Child Labour in Canadian Supply Chains (audit?) Canadian and US maximum permissible level of heavy metals in fish Canadian label ingredients Supplying Water to Employees in Canadian Manufacturing Facilities Canadian Metal Detectable Limits How to check conformity to Canadian FCM regulations Canadian regulations on the resale of moldy product to a salvage company Merging Canadian and USA Labelling Requirements When exporting from Europe, is it possible to put double labels, US and Canadian, on the same pack? Exporting Food to US with Canadian Label