Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Quick Hello and BRC vs SQF question

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Matt Bova

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:08 AM

Hi everyone! New forum member introduction myself and also asking for some tips.

 

I'm a long time QA Manager under the BRC audit standard but last week I started in a Director level position at a facility under SQF.

 

Any pitfalls I should avoid or slight differences I should pay extra attention to as I get familiar with my new standard?

 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,834 posts
  • 1163 thanks
1,197
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 12 December 2017 - 01:56 PM

Hi Matt, welcome.

 

I believe you will find an ease of getting into SQF as SQF is substantially easier in all areas in comparison with BRC. 

 

I am sure that others may argue this, but after ten years of auditing first (SQF) and then consulting on SQF and BRC it is what we have found.

 

Best to you.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC

Consulting on: SQF Food Safety System Development, Implementation & Certification

eConsultant Retainer | Internal Auditor Training | Corrective Action Avoidance | XRP & XLM

 

Vineyard Haven, Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachussetts

Republic of these United States (restored)
 

www.GlennOster.com | 774.563.6161 | glenn@glennoster.com
 

 

 

 


FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 591 thanks
211
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:47 PM

Ditto to SQFConsultant, I find that in compared to other standards, SQF often specifically includes a clause to the tone of "do this, but if you can't, identify controls to make sure that your process/equipment/facility remains safe and effective regardless". In this way it makes you address the hazard, but doesn't necessarily bind you to a specific solution like BRC often does. Heck, half the time for SQF if you can demonstrate compliance with a rule (e.g. storage) and people are trained on it, you can skip an entire "policy" document.


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.



Share this


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users