What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Difference between anthracite & activated carbon in filtration?

Started by , Oct 12 2015 07:20 AM
2 Replies

Hi all, 

 

Anyone knows the difference between Anthracite and activated carbon that used in filtration system? And what is the aspect we need to look into it when conducting hazard analysis on this material? Thanks in advance. 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Is there a difference between Organic Food Fraud and Conventional food fraud? Difference between correction, corrective action and preventive action? Difference between Food safety plan and HACCP Difference between incidence reporting and emergency preparedness SQF Level 2 and 3 difference
[Ad]

Anthracite is a form of coal and activated carbon is a processed charcoal made from various sources.  What hazards you would consider would depend on what you are using it to filter, if there is a kill step later in the processing, and what grade/type of the filtration materials you are using.  Look at it from a logical point of view.  What risk could anything that contacts your filtrate (the stuff you are filtering) present to your final product?  Then apply those risks to the charcoal or anthracite filtering material.

 

From http://unifilt.com/faqs.php#faq-1:

 

What’s the difference between granular activated carbon and anthracite?

 

Anthracite filter media is employed in the filtration process to remove particulate matter that has already been precipitated out of solution and is sometimes chemically treated to improve its filterability. It doesn’t function very well at the molecular level because its pores are very small, much smaller than most of the molecules that must normally be removed.

 

GAC (granular activated carbon) is made from agglomerations of PAC (powdered activated carbon) particles. PAC is produced by driving out volatiles and burning away carbon in order to increase the size of the pores in the carbon particles until they resemble a molecular sponge. Depending upon the pore size, activated carbon can even be processed to be selective, removing certain molecules and leaving others behind. This pore structure causes the removal of molecules by the process of adsorption onto the surface of the carbon particle, followed by diffusion into and absorption in the pores. Precipitation is not necessary in this case. However, backwashing alone won’t remove the matter that’s been absorbed into the pores. It can only be removed by a re-generation process.

 

Anthracite filter media also removes particulate matter from the flow by adsorption. However, this is only a surface phenomenon. Generally, there’s no diffusion into the pores, and the adsorbed matter (adsorbate) is easily removed by agitation during backwashing.

 

Martha

Thanks Martha.

 

Carine, who, what, why, when and where is the filtration system used.

As you know it is difficult to conduct an effective hazard analysis without this kind of detail.

 

We want to help you. :smile:

 

Regards,

Simon.


Similar Discussion Topics
Is there a difference between Organic Food Fraud and Conventional food fraud? Difference between correction, corrective action and preventive action? Difference between Food safety plan and HACCP Difference between incidence reporting and emergency preparedness SQF Level 2 and 3 difference Difference between Extract VS Flavour? What difference between CP and OPRP in ISO 22000 What is the difference between Whitebait and Blanchbait? Difference between clauses 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 BRC Issue 8 Difference in microbiological count in same process (EMP)