Your opinions on MAN as Root Cause and 'No Blame Policy'
Started by Zeeshan, Dec 17 2013 08:14 AM
Dear Members,
What is your personal opinion about tagging causes to MAN while doing root cause analysis under 'No blame policy'. If I am going to follow a 'no blame policy', I should tag all the causes to either 'Machine', 'Material', 'Method', ........ but not 'Man'.
Hope not inducing confusions about traditional 4M Concept ????? :shutup:
Zeeshan.
Root Cause Analysis for Non-Conformities After BRCGS Audit
Nail Varnish Policy for Visitors: Is it Too Strict?
Creating a Recall Policy Document: Templates Needed
Ensuring Quality Policy Communication and Understanding
Request for Food Contact Equipment Policy
[Ad]
Hello Zeeshan,
In a robust and joined up root cause analysis process MAN is very much a valid cause, even under a No Blame Policy. However, it is another MAN who is responsible for solving the issue MANagement.
fishbone.jpg 50.33KB 12 downloads
1 Thank
Root Cause Analysis for Non-Conformities After BRCGS Audit
Nail Varnish Policy for Visitors: Is it Too Strict?
Creating a Recall Policy Document: Templates Needed
Ensuring Quality Policy Communication and Understanding
Request for Food Contact Equipment Policy
Is Root Cause Analysis Always Necessary?
Opinions on setting up a quality spec. policy
What could be the root cause for a non-conformance related to scope determination and documentation in an ISO 22000 Stage 1 audit?
Can you provide a template or example of a food loss and waste policy procedure for a semi-refined carrageenan company?
Approving farm supplier for dried ginseng root