Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Would a truck carrier be considered a contract vendor?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

glendora

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 18 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 16 July 2013 - 07:09 PM

Question: Would a truck carrier be considered a contract vendor? Thanks.



esquef

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 374 posts
  • 235 thanks
41
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 July 2013 - 08:56 PM

I treat them as such and have our Shipping & Receiving Manager do a 3 x 2 risk analysis similar to what we do for our raw material and packaging suppliers in the Supplier Approval Program. This is done for all carriers on an annual basis.



Thanked by 1 Member:

glendora

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 18 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 17 July 2013 - 12:08 AM

esquef -- thanks for the reply. We will use the same RA format as we do with the other vendors.



George @ Safefood 360°

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • Corporate Sponsor
  • 374 posts
  • 327 thanks
31
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ireland and USA

Posted 22 July 2013 - 06:48 PM

A definite yes. It is not unusual for these vendors to sign off on a code of practice as part of the approval process.

 

George



Gourav

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 71 posts
  • 21 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Delhi

Posted 23 July 2013 - 10:20 AM

We get them to sign a specif contract which mentions everything about vehicle condition, temperatures to be maintained etc. We use a checklist also using which the condition of the truck given for carrying the food is checked randomly. We summarize the checks on monthly basis and share them with the vendor. 





Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users