Thanks to all for their input.
mgourley
if a facility was not working toward any certifications in the past and had MD systems in place but now has contract with a customer whom requires certification or they want to comply with changes in the Food Safety Laws would they be obligated to purchase new equipment just to validate the process?
Since the environment and specific location could have an effect on detection capability, it would seem the validation should be performed after installation yet prior to production.
No, they would not be obligated to purchase new equipment. This is what I was referring to in my post. In my situation, the metal detectors were here long before I was and when they were installed, nobody was concerned with "validating" whether or not they were suitable for the purpose.
So now, I can't actually validate the selection of equipment, but I can show that what we have is industry standard and it operates correctly and to the industry standard for the type of
metal detection equipment that it is.
Codex is pretty specific in the definition of "validation" and "verification". SQF, not so much. SQF has sort of melded the two definitions as far as I can tell.
My contention was that the only way to "validate" equipment, per Codex, is if it is new equipment, not currently in use.
Marshall