Dear All,
The new issue of BRC Food includes a decision tree to decide wether a department is low care, high care or high risk. The new issue also includes strict requirements regarding segregation and hygien for high care and high risk areas.
A lot of organisations, which do not have determined high care or high risk areas now are forced to do with the new issue of BRC.
Is your company forced to build high care/high risk area?
What are the expected costs/investments involved?
How do you motivate your decision, if you decide it is not high care/ high risk and the decision tree say it is? Auditors need to approve these motivations. What do you think is acceptable?
I already have a lot of cases of companies which do not have a high care/ high risk department right now, but will be forced to have one for issue 6. Some of them will leave BRC, due to major costs involved and the small risks involved.
Please share your experiences and opinions regarding the decision tree.
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More