Greetings!
Can any one share the below draft documents as soon:
- Cleaning schedule
- Surface and hands swabsanalysis schedule
Many thanks in advance,
Posted 06 May 2010 - 07:10 AM
Greetings!
Can any one share the below draft documents as soon:
Posted 08 May 2010 - 08:30 AM
Dear Abdul,
You may hv to (substantially) expand yr request, eg type / risk process ??
Try a search ? (I/others hv linked/posted various cleaning programs in other threads}
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 08 May 2010 - 10:29 AM
Dear Abdul,
You may hv to (substantially) expand yr request, eg type / risk process ??
Try a search ? (I/others hv linked/posted various cleaning programs in other threads}
Rgds / Charles.C
Posted 09 May 2010 - 06:20 PM
Dear Abdul,
Regarding cleaning schedule, here is a basic table scheme which i posted some while back -
http://www.fda.gov/F...s/ucm064458.htm
comment added 250714/Charles.C - above link seems to have now morphed into >>
http://www.fda.gov/F...s/ucm064458.htm
(go to section VII - A - Fig4)
Clearly, yr details will depend on the process/equipment etc. The table shown illustrates basics for a fairly simple layout, would expect further documented details as per the comments listed under the table.
(Some people compile a set of SOPs for each separate activity and then cross-reference into a master table. I recall there are quite detailed examples of this on the USFDA site somewhere.)
I would add to reference example that the chemicals etc must hv appropriate documentation, eg approved for food factory use / approved supplier whatever (this is sort of automatically assumed in the ref. i think due to the specific example)
Regarding yr swab schedule - it depends as usual on the particular process however I think many people (approximately) split the areas based on a "risk" evaluation and then propose an appropriate sampling scheme to suitably cover the various designated areas.
I don't know what microbiological you are analysing yr swabs for or the process risk however a routine 6 swabs/week seems a large amount to me if a low risk scenario (?).
I didn't see any reference to a results form / evaluation standards?. IMEX, it is also quite common to hv a documented corrective action plan crosss-referenced somewhere? (Most people need it at some time or other.)
Not exactly sure what "worker" means - hands? gloves? clothing?
Some schedules include an evaluation of items like post-toilet worker's hand status.
Do you already hv a system running ?
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 12 May 2010 - 05:00 AM
Dear Abdul,
Regarding cleaning schedule, here is a basic table scheme which i posted some while back -
http://www.fda.gov/F...s/ucm064458.htm
(go to section VII - A - Fig4)
Clearly, yr details will depend on the process/equipment etc. The table shown illustrates basics for a fairly simple layout, would expect further documented details as per the comments listed under the table.
(Some people compile a set of SOPs for each separate activity and then cross-reference into a master table. I recall there are quite detailed examples of this on the USFDA site somewhere.)
I would add to reference example that the chemicals etc must hv appropriate documentation, eg approved for food factory use / approved supplier whatever (this is sort of automatically assumed in the ref. i think due to the specific example)
Regarding yr swab schedule - it depends as usual on the particular process however I think many people (approximately) split the areas based on a "risk" evaluation and then propose an appropriate sampling scheme to suitably cover the various designated areas.
I don't know what microbiological you are analysing yr swabs for or the process risk however a routine 6 swabs/week seems a large amount to me if a low risk scenario (?).
I didn't see any reference to a results form / evaluation standards?. IMEX, it is also quite common to hv a documented corrective action plan crosss-referenced somewhere? (Most people need it at some time or other.)
Not exactly sure what "worker" means - hands? gloves? clothing?
Some schedules include an evaluation of items like post-toilet worker's hand status.
Do you already hv a system running ?
Rgds / Charles.C
Posted 13 May 2010 - 12:27 AM
Dear Abdul,
I'm not quite sure the exact sequence of steps involved in your "blending / manufacturing of jams" but I presume the result is a RTE product which IMEX would be automatically classified as a high risk process, and even more sure if a heating pasteurisation stage is involved as perhaps the vacuum cooking item in yr attachment ? If I understand the flow correctly, this would also tend to indicate the location of higher risk sections.
Either way, I would hv thought that, numerically, yr proposed sampling sceme would be auditorily acceptable if done on a monthly basis, (assuming that the results are generally satisfactory) (? ).
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 13 May 2010 - 07:58 AM
Dear Abdul,
I'm not quite sure the exact sequence of steps involved in your "blending / manufacturing of jams" but I presume the result is a RTE product which IMEX would be automatically classified as a high risk process, and even more sure if a heating pasteurisation stage is involved as perhaps the vacuum cooking item in yr attachment ? If I understand the flow correctly, this would also tend to indicate the location of higher risk sections.
Either way, I would hv thought that, numerically, yr proposed sampling sceme would be auditorily acceptable if done on a monthly basis, (assuming that the results are generally satisfactory) (? ).
Rgds / Charles.C
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users